TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) as described below:
APPLICANT: Mr. Allan Feker
U.S. Capital Alliance, LLC
880 Airport Road, Suite 113
Ormond Beach, Florida 32174
WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect waters of the United States associated with the Tomoka River Hydrologic Basin (10-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (0308020102)). The project site is north of S.R. 40 and Airport Road, west of I-95, in Sections 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, and 22, Township 14 South, Range 31 East, Flagler County, Florida.
Directions to the site are as follows: From I-95, take SR 40 west to Tymber Creek Road, then turn north and continue to Airport Road and take Airport Road west to the site.
APPROXIMATE CENTRAL COORDINATES:
Latitude: 29.27908°
Longitude: -81.17829°
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Basic: Commercial and residential development
Overall: Commercial and residential development in the Ormond Beach area west of I-95, Flagler County, Florida.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project site (3,315± acres) consists of the following vegetative communities: Pine flatwoods, cypress, hydric pine flatwoods, cypress/pine/cabbage palm mix, and freshwater marsh. The Pine flatwoods are dominated by Slash pine, Saw palmetto, gallberry, and typical groundcover species. The wetland communities are dominated by their classification species (i.e. cypress or cypress/pine/cabbage palm mix). The project contains approximately 1,980 acre of wetlands and surface waters. Silviculture activities have taken place on site, and there have been several fires that have altered the site.
PROPOSED WORK: The applicant seeks authorization to fill 144.41 acres of waters of the United States to construct a mixed use commercial and residential subdivision including infrastructure (roadways and stormwater management system). The applicant is seeking a 15-year permit given the size of the project.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION INFORMATION: The applicant has provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment:
“Several design elements and considerations were utilized to avoid and minimize wetland impacts the greatest extent practical in the currently proposed project design. Careful consideration was given to the sizing and location of the facility components to minimize wetland impacts while maintaining necessary requirements to meet project objectives. An alternative site analysis and avoidance and minimization analysis report was completed that resulted in the proposed plan.”
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: The applicant has offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable functional loss to the aquatic environment:
“To compensate for the proposed impacts, the applicant proposes ±2,166.04 acres of on-site wetland enhancement and ±194.46 acres of on-site upland enhancement. Most of the on-site mitigation proposed will occur in the western portion of the project area adjacent to the development parcel and will serve to restore the natural habitat type and hydrologic regime in the area. Enhancement of these regionally-significant wetlands will also provide water quality benefits to Hull Creek swamp and the Little Tomoka River. In addition, the mitigation parcel shares its northern boundary with Lake Swamp Mitigation Bank and is connected via wildlife underpasses to Tiger Bay State Forest south of SR 40.”
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The Corps is not aware of any known historic properties within the permit area. Our final determination relative to historic resource impacts is subject to review by and coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer and those federally recognized tribes with concerns in Florida and the Permit Area.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: The Corps has determined the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, the wood stork (Mycteria americana) and Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi).
A portion of the proposed activity is within a Core Foraging Area (CFA) of a wood stork rookery; the project supports marginally Suitable Foraging Habitat (SFH) for wood stork. Based on the Effect Determination Key for the Wood Stork in Central and North Peninsular Florida (dated September 2008), the Corps determination sequence was A>B>C>D>E = “may affect but is not likely to adversely affect”. The determination is supported by SFH compensation provided by the enhancement, restoration or creation of SFH in a project phased approach that provides an amount of habitat and foraging function equivalent to that of the impacted SFH (consistent with the Wood Stork Foraging Habitat Assessment Procedure); and is not contrary to the Service’s “Habitat Management Guidelines for the Wood Stork in the Southeast Region”. No further consultation is required.
Based on the Eastern Indigo Snake Effect Determination Key (dated January 25, 2010; August 13, 2013 Addendum), the Corps’ determination sequence resulted in A>B>C>D>E = “may affect but is not likely to adversely affect”. This determination results from there being less than 25 acres of xeric habitat, and fewer than 25 active/inactive gopher tortoise burrows, on the project site. All gopher tortoise burrows, active or inactive, will be evacuated prior to site manipulation in the burrow vicinity. The permittee agrees to use the Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake (dated August 12, 2013). No further consultation is required.
The Corps has determined the proposal would have no effect on any other listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH): This notice initiates consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service on EFH as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1996. Our initial determination is that the proposed action would not have a substantial adverse impact on EFH. Our final determination relative to project impacts and the need for mitigation measures is subject to review by and coordination with the National Marine Fisheries Service.
NOTE: This public notice is being issued based on information furnished by the applicant. This information has not been verified or evaluated to ensure compliance with laws and regulation governing the regulatory program. The jurisdictional line has not been verified by Corps personnel.
AUTHORIZATION FROM OTHER AGENCIES: Water Quality Certification will be required from the St. Johns River Water Management District.
COMMENTS regarding the potential authorization of the work proposed should be submitted in writing to the attention of the District through the Cocoa Permits Section, 400 High Point Drive, Suite 600, Cocoa, FL 32926 within 30 days from the date of this notice.
The decision whether to issue or deny this permit application will be based on the information received from this public notice and the evaluation of the probable impact to the associated wetlands. This is based on an analysis of the applicant's avoidance and minimization efforts for the project, as well as the compensatory mitigation proposed.
QUESTIONS concerning this application should be directed to the project manager, John Palmer, in writing at the Cocoa Permits Section, 400 High Point Drive, Suite 600, Cocoa, FL 32926, by electronic mail at John.Palmer@usace.army.mil, by fax at (321) 504-3803, or by telephone at (321) 504-3771, extension 10.
IMPACT ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Preliminary review of this application indicates that an Environmental Impact Statement will not be required. Coordination with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Marine Fisheries Services, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, environmental groups, and concerned citizens generally yields pertinent environmental information that is instrumental in determining the impact the proposed action will have on the natural resources of the area. By means of this notice, we are soliciting comments on the potential effects of the project on threatened or endangered species or their habitat
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including cumulative impacts thereof; among these are conservation, economics, esthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food, and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people. Evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will also include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, EPA, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act of the criteria established under authority of Section 102(a) of the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972. A permit will be granted unless its issuance is found to be contrary to the public interest.
The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other Interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY: In Florida, the State approval constitutes compliance with the approved Coastal Zone Management Plan. In Puerto Rico, a Coastal Zone Management Consistency Concurrence is required from the Puerto Rico Planning Board, in the Virgin Islands, the Department of Planning and Natural Resources permit constitutes compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Plan.
REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request a public hearing. The request must be submitted in writing to the District Engineer within the designated comment period of the notice and must state the specific reasons for requesting the public hearing.