Puerto Rico CSRM Feasibility Study

The Puerto Rico CSRM Study was initiated in October 2018 and was scheduled to conclude in October 2021, however a schedule extension was requested to re-evaluate the storm damage modeling and also to conduct environmental resource surveys. The extension was approved in October 2021 and the study’s new completion date is May 2024. The study team will produce a revised draft report which is currently scheduled to be available for public review  June 12, 2023. 

This study will assess the shoreline problems and provide possible Coastal Storm Risk Management alternatives to reduce risk to infrastructure located along specific areas of Puerto Rico. The study originally considered 13 locations identified by Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DNER) to have potential for a feasibility study. These areas are located in San Juan, Carolina, Vega Baja, Arecibo, Aguadilla, Aguada, Rincón, Anasco, Mayaguez, Cabo Rojo, Loiza, Luquillo, and Humacao.

Narrowing of the study areas began with assessing areas of high density of infrastructure at risk from coastal storms which would be an indicator of high potential benefits under a Federal project.  Study scoping resulted in the following areas showing potential for Federal interest: the San Juan (Condado, Ocean Park and Isla Verde) and Rincón coastlines.


 

 

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is Federal interest in a plan to reduce damages to property and infrastructure as a result of erosion, wave attack, and flooding from coastal storms and hurricanes along the Condado, Ocean Park, Isla Verde and Rincon coastlines. Following the study schedule extension, the study team will produce a revised draft report, which will be available for public review.  The report will consider an array of storm damage reduction alternatives and their effects under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.



 

Section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611 granted authority for the Puerto Rico Coastal Study. Study funds are appropriated under Title IV, Subdivision B of the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 2018, P.L. 115-123. The study will examine alternative solutions, and will recommend one plan that meets Corps criteria to be the Tentatively Selected Plan.  If the alternative is supported by Corps decisions makers, it will receive an approved Chief’s Report recommending it for construction.  The plan will then need to receive appropriations for construction.



 

 

This study considers the main problem within the San Juan and Rincon focus areas to be coastal storms causing damage to structures and infrastructure due to wave attack, flooding and erosion.

Hurricane and coastal storms are responsible for significant damages to structures and infrastructure due to wave attack, flooding and erosion for the entire island of Puerto Rico. These storm events threaten public and private properties, critical infrastructure as well as recreational and beach areas. Many structures are located along the majority of the study area, including commercial businesses, hotels, condominiums, single family homes,  in addition to roads, public parkland, and public beach access points. Loss of protective beaches and dunes, due to shoreline recession, threatens properties and infrastructure. Sea level rise and coastal storms will continue to exacerbate erosion in the study area, damaging structures and infrastructures and threatening recreational resources. Homeowners and businesses seeking to protect their property have constructed some shore protection measures, such as seawalls, large stone revetments and gabions. Some of the structures and materials used are inadequate to provide significant storm damage protection and are often constructed in an uncoordinated fashion without regard to system-wide coastal processes, exacerbating erosion on adjacent shorelines



 

Project Schedule  

  • December 2018 - Alternative milestone 

  • November 2022 - Tentatively selected plan milestone 

  • June  2023 - Draft report and NEPA - public technical and policy review 

  • October 2023 - Agency decision milestone 

  • April  2024 - Final report - State and agency review 

  • May 2024 - Chief of Engineers report 

  • 2024 - Initiate Pre-construction engineering and design (Tentative) 

  • 2026 – Initiate construction (Tentative) 

 

The Recommended Plan in Rincón is Alternative 4, which proposes acquisition of the most vulnerable structures along the shoreline, which are predicted to fail from erosive forces and be condemned by local government due to safety issues in the near future.  With this plan, 71 high-risk structures along approximately 1.1 miles of shoreline would be included for fee acquisition and residents would be given compensation to leave their homes prior to complete structural failure of their homes, and they would be provided relocation assistance. The structures would be removed, and the land would be returned to its natural sandy state which would involve filling in the newly acquired properties with beach-quality sand (if needed) and revegetation with native species.  With this restored shoreline buffer, the local government along with the community would be afforded space and time to establish a long-term shoreline management plan and put that plan into effect. This plan would not require mitigation and additionally would re-establish habitat, eventually creating 17 acres of beach and small dune habitat for nesting sea turtles, shoreline birds, and other species. The sandy shoreline would be allowed to naturally recover and would ensure that the tourism-based regional economy could thrive into the future by maintaining local tourism spending.  The plan uses nature-based and non-structural solutions and is also supported by the Governor of Puerto Rico, the Mayor of Rincón, and the Secretary of DNER.  The plan would positively affect the town of Stella, in large part as it would increase natural aesthetics and restore cultural identity of the community. The cost to benefit ratio for this plan is less than 1.0, and as such per USACE policy, an exception has been requested approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Civil Works.  

In Ocean Park, where coastal flooding is the primary problem, Alternative 2 was the tentatively selected plan in the June 2023 draft report.  However, Alternative 5 is now the recommended plan.  Alternative 5, which was included in the final array of alternatives, is the same as Alternative 2, with additional fee acquisition of six townhomes and one vacant property west of Barbosa Park. Since the release of the Draft Report in June 2023, USACE determined the initially-proposed flood protection levee easements over these properties were likely insufficient and fee acquisition is required due to the uncertainty of duration of property inaccessibility (if floodgates are not removed in a timely manner by the local government) and for the potential to induced flooding,. The expanded fee acquisition and relocation assistance to those homeowners, changes the recommended plan from Alternative 2 to Alternative 5. This change results in a cost increase and a benefit to cost ratio less than 1 but is identified as the total benefits plan. Additional analyses will be performed during Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) to confirm if the assumptions still warrant acquisition of these properties, and if needed, design changes could be made at that time. This plan would greatly reduce the risk of coastal flooding to Ocean Park, with the installation of the floodwalls at the most critical areas, Barbosa Park and the skate park. This plan would continue to allow for use of the beach in front of the floodwall at Barbosa Park, and also allow public access over it to maintain existing accessibility to the beach park. Additionally, business disruption due to coastal flooding is reduced and life safety risk is reduced as a result of this plan.  Fee acquisition of the 8 properties west of Barbosa Park and restoration of them to a natural environment would increase beach and small dune habitat by approximately 1 acre.  The cost to benefit ratio for this plan is less than 1.0, and as such per USACE policy, an exception has been requested by the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Civil Works and is pending approval. 

Study Status and Updates The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) Puerto Rico Coastal Study is investigating the coastal storm risks in the areas of Ocean Park and Rincon to identify long-term solutions to impacts from coastal storms and sea level rise. The USACE released a Draft Report in November 2020 with a tentative plan to reduce coastal storm risk due to erosion, coastal flooding, and wave attack. Since then, the study schedule has been extended to conduct additional technical analyses and environmental resource surveys.   USACE released a revised Draft Report for public review and comment in June 2023. The June 2023 revised Draft Report  introduced tentatively selected plans in both Rincon, where the primary problem is erosion, and Ocean Park, where the primary problem is coastal flooding. The tentatively selected plan (TSP) in Rincon was Alternative 4, Acquisition of vulnerable structures; the tentatively selected plan in Ocean Park was Alternative 2, Floodwalls (Barbosa Park and Las Marias Skate Park). 

Since the draft report was released, feedback from the non-federal sponsor (DNER), communities, and policy reviewers have led to refinements of the TSP in both reaches and an endorsement of a recommended plan.  The recommended plan in Rincon is Alternative 4, and the recommended plan in Ocean Park has changed from Alternative 2 (as presented in the draft report) to alternative 5 (Floodwalls with expanded acquisition).  More information on these plans can be found in the “Recommended Plan” tab on this website.  

The 2022 benthic habitat and species (environmental) surveys conducted illustrated the high quality and diverse nature of the nearshore coral reef complexes and the presence of sensitive and endangered species. This information was vital for both selecting the best comprehensive plan and obtaining compliance from natural resource agencies. 

Currently, the final report is scheduled to be released for state and agency review in April 2024, and will be posted on the study website.  A Chief’s Report is scheduled for May 2024.  

During the comment period, the team will be accepting comments at: PuertoRicoCoastalStudy@usace.army.mil

While email comments are preferred, those who wish to submit comments by mail can do so using the following address:  

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District 
ATTN: Gretchen Ehlinger 
701 San Marco Blvd 
Jacksonville, FL 32207-8175 

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS / THE PREGUNTAS FRECUENTES

Collapse All Expand All
 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS / THE PREGUNTAS FRECUENTES

Compiled Q&A from draft report public comments

 

  1. What is the purpose of the proposed project?

The purpose of the study is to determine the federal interest in a plan to reduce damages from coastal flooding due to storm surges, tides, and waves, with sea level rise, in the most vulnerable interior back bay areas of the San Juan Metro Area.

  1. Who is conducting the study and why?

 

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has conducted the study with the non-federal sponsor the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DNER). In response to these problems, USACE is pursuing this study to determine a recommended plan to reduce coastal flooding damages, under Section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, with funds provided under the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 2018 Public Law 115-123.

 

  1. What is the proposed project?

The Recommended Plan consists of a collection of key structural and natural and nature-based features in strategic locations designed to appropriate elevations which work together to reduce the risk of damages as a result of coastal flooding from high water events that result from storm surge, waves, tides and sea level change, and combinations of these forces, in the San Juan Metro Area.

The Recommended Plan is at a feasibility level of design, or approximately 10% level of design, and includes levees (1.5 miles), a series of breakwaters over 0.7 miles along the Cataño shoreline, seawall/floodwalls (6.5 miles), elevated living shoreline (0.7 miles), discharge structure on the Malaria Canal, and associated inland hydrology features (to ensure that rainfall runoff is able to continue to outflow as it currently does, with the Recommended Plan features in place).

 

  1. Is environmental mitigation a part of the recommended plan?

Yes.  The Recommended Plan contributes to creation of habitat in some areas.  In other areas, although the Recommended Plan was formulated to avoid and minimize impacts to the extent practicable, some  impacts to submerged aquatic vegetation, mangroves, and wetlands are expected to occur and would be addressed through mitigation, which is evaluated in the preliminary mitigation plan in Appendix F, Environmental, Attachment 4, and in Chapter 4 in the Main Report. There is some uncertainty in terms of the quantity and siting of  compensatory mitigation which would be further evaluated during the Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) Phase of the project when site-specific survey data is available. Upon final design, any functional lift (habitat creation) provided by the construction of the Recommended Plan would be incorporated into the functional assessment and the final mitigation plan.

 

  1. Will my property experience flooding as a result of the project?

 

No. All alternatives were formulated to ensure that rainfall runoff would still be accounted for behind the proposed features, through appropriately sized culverts or pumps, which will allow the rainfall runoff to pass through the features to the locations they currently do, without the features in place.This will ensure that communities behind the features will not incur additional flooding from rainfall runoff as a result of the features. To reduce long term operation and maintenance, gravity flow culverts are included in the design whenever possible and small pump stations are only used when absolutely necessary.

 

 

  1. How tall will the proposed features be?

The study team did their best to balance storm damage reduction, life safety, public acceptability, cost, and economic justification during the feasibility planning process. While the current 10% level of designs in WSJB 1B, 2, and 3 assume a design elevation of 9 ft-PRVD02 and WSJB 4 at 8.5 ft PRVD02, the actual height of the seawall that is seen by the community from a street view would generally be less than that, depending on the ground elevation.  On average seawall heights would be 4-5 feet from street level.  For example, along the Ferry Terminal in Catano, the wall would be approximately 3 feet high, due to higher ground elevations in that area.   On average, the living shoreline along Condado Lagoon would be 4-5 feet from street view.  The design team understands the concerns regarding the potential impacts to economic development and will continue coordination with the non-federal sponsor and community leaders, pending an approved Chief’s Report and congressional authorization, to minimize impact as much as possible to this highly urbanized and important community economic engine for the area.  Renderings have been created for key areas to visually show heights relative to a person on the street, and are posted on this website.

 

  1. Will I still have access to the water?

Yes.  In the recommended plan 10% level of design,the team has included  walkovers which will allow access over or through the structures, at various locations, through a combination of walkovers and or deployable storm surge barriers for the landward structures. These walkovers are required for operation and maintenance, but would be available to the public to use for recreational opportunities and would maintain the current public accessibility and viewshed.   

 

  1. Will any existing recreational facilities be impacted by the project?

 

No, existing recreational facilities in the area will not be impacted.Temporary impacts to recreational activities during construction are anticipated. As a public safety measure, boating would be prohibited near the operating construction equipment.Recreational access to these areas would return to pre-construction conditions following completion of the project.Although short-term impacts could occur, no long-term adverse effects are anticipated. Commercial shipping would continue in the Federal navigation channel. Information would be provided to the USCG so they could issue a “Notice to Mariners” prior to initiation of construction and for each major change in the construction activities.This would alert public boaters of areas to avoid and the possibility of limited and restricted access.No significant adverse impacts to recreational boating are expected from the proposed project

 

  1. Will there be recreational opportunities associated with this project?

 

Yes, incidental recreation opportunities would result from this project, and are described by reach, below.

 

Condado Lagoon: The recommended plan proposes to construct an elevated living shoreline on the northern shoreline of the lagoon.  The elevated living shoreline would have a 10-foot top width and would be topped with crushed limestone with access intervals for the purposes of operation and maintenance.  This feature would be available to the community for incidental recreation opportunities where it could be used for running, biking, fishing, walking, and access to the lagoon, etc.  This feature would connect the existing southern and western walkways to create a full walking path around the lagoon. 

 

West San Juan Bay 1:  The recommended plan proposes to construct a levee on the southwestern portion of the reach.  The levee would have a 12-foot top width and would be topped with crushed limestone with access intervals for the purposes of operation and maintenance.  This feature would be available to the community for incidental recreation opportunities where it could be used for running, biking, fishing, walking, etc.  Access to La Esparanza park and along the shoreline for access to the water would be maintained through gaps in the floodwall, where deployable floodwalls would be used.  Access to parking would be maintained.  Existing recreational features in this reach, as described in Chapter 2, would not be negatively impacted.

 

West San Juan Bay 2: The recommended plan proposes to construct a levee on the western portion of the reach.  The levee would have a 12-foot top width and would be topped with crushed limestone with access intervals for the purposes of operation and maintenance.  This feature would be available to the community for incidental recreation opportunities where it could be used for running, biking, fishing, walking, etc. Existing recreational features in this reach, as described in Chapter 2, would not be negatively impacted.

 

West San Juan Bay 3: The recommended plan proposes to construct a seawall along the northern and eastern shoreline.  Access to the water along the shoreline for would be maintained through gaps in the floodwall, where deployable floodwalls would be used, or through walkover features such as boardwalks for the purposes of operation and maintenance; however, would be available to the public to use for recreational opportunities Some boat docks in La Puntilla could be impacted; the configuration of the floodwall will be further evaluated in PED to avoid impacts as much as possible. Although relocations of public facilities such as boat docks and boardwalks are not currently anticipated or identified, a more detailed analysis will be conducted during PED.

 

West San Juan Bay 4: The recommended plan proposes to construct a levee on the southeastern portion of the reach.  The levee would have a 12-foot top width and would be topped with crushed limestone with access intervals for the purposes of operation and maintenance.  This feature would be available to the community for incidental recreation opportunities where it could be used for running, biking, fishing, walking, etc.  There are no known recreational features in this area, and therefore none would be impacted.

 

 

  1. What are the benefits of this overall project?

 

The Recommended Plan uses key structural and natural and nature-based features in strategic locations designed to appropriate elevations which work together to effectively and efficiently reduce estimated damages due to coastal flooding by 98% to 100% in the San Juan Metro Area. The Recommended Plan provides average annual net benefits (AAEQ) of $57.6M each year of a 50-year period of analysis. The Recommended Plan is economically justified with a benefit to cost ratio of 4.8.

  1. What are the benefits of this project in Condado Lagoon reach?

 The Recommended Plan, which includes an elevated living shoreline, provides important and extremely effective coastal flooding damage reduction to the dense assets, including critical infrastructure, within the Condado Lagoon area.  The recommended plan in this reach will have some impacts to submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) and mangroves, but would also construct an elevated living shoreline which will add native vegetation such as mangroves to the area, creating habitat, as well as contributing to potential incidental water quality improvements to the lagoon.  The recommended plan maintains life safety for residents while reducing damages, and provides a large incidental benefit in that the Recommended Plan will also reduce the frequent tidal flooding problems experienced by the communities.  The plan also increases incidental recreational opportunities in the area as the elevated living shoreline can be used by the community for hiking, biking, etc.  The elevated living shoreline will be constructed on the north side of the lagoon where there is currently not a sidewalk; therefore it will essentially close the loop to create a complete walking path, connecting the existing Riverwalk on the south side of the lagoon, and the existing bridge pathways on the east side of the lagoon.  The Recommended Plan could create a boost to the local economy through increased access to the lagoon for activities, and it ultimately provides resilience to the entire reach, allowing the communities to return to normal life sooner and with less economic impacts after an event.  More specifically, in this reach, the Recommended Plan would reduce risk from an event with an approximate 0.44% annual exceedance probability and would provide approximately 98% damage reduction under the intermediate sea level rise curve, and approximately 94% damage reduction under the high sea level rise curve. 

 

  1. What are the benefits of this project in WSJB 1B reach?

 The Recommended Plan which includes seawalls and a levee provides extremely effective coastal flooding damage reduction to the assets within the area, including critical infrastructure.  The recommended plan maintains life safety for residents while reducing damages. The Recommended Plan ultimately provides resilience to the entire reach, allowing the communities to return to normal life sooner and with less economic impacts after an event. Regionally, the Casa Bacardi Factory provides benefits to tourism and the ability to recover more quickly after a storm event would boost the economy. More specifically, in this reach, the Recommended Plan would reduce risk from an event with an approximate 0.18% annual exceedance probability and would provide close to 100% damage reduction under the intermediate sea level rise curve, and approximately 97% damage reduction under the high sea level rise curve. 

  1. What are the benefits of this project in WSJB 2 reach?

The Recommended Plan which includes a discharge structure and levee (connecting to the levee in WSJB 1B) has very minimal features and associated construction  compared to the other alternatives which were considered and provides extremely effective coastal flooding damage reduction to the high density of assets, including critical infrastructure, within the area.    The plan could also provide incidental water quality improvements to the freshwater wetlands located in the area.   The Recommended Plan ultimately provides resilience to the entire reach, allowing the communities to return to normal life sooner and with less economic impacts after an event.

More specifically, in this reach, the Recommended Plan would reduce risk from an event with an approximate 0.18% annual exceedance probability and would provide close to 100% damage reduction under the intermediate sea level rise curve, and close to 100% damage reduction under the high sea level rise curve. 

  1. What are the benefits of this project in WSJB 3 reach?

WSJB 3: The Recommended Plan which includes a breakwater and seawalls/floodwalls provides extremely effective coastal flooding damage reduction and wave action reduction to the high density of assets, including critical infrastructure, within the area.  The breakwater could potentially support mangroves and provide foraging habitat for fish on the landward side.  The recommended plan maintains life safety for residents while reducing damages, allows continued access and gathering along the important Cataño shoreline gathering area, and provides social cohesion for the entire West San Jun Bay area.  The Recommended Plan ultimately provides resilience to the entire reach, allowing the communities to return to normal life sooner and with less economic impacts after an event.  More specifically, in this reach, the Recommended Plan would reduce risk from an event with an approximate 0.18% annual exceedance probability and would provide approximately 99% damage reduction under the intermediate sea level rise curve, and approximately 99% damage reduction under the high sea level rise curve. 

  1. What are the benefits of this project in WSJB 4 reach?

 

WSJB 4: The Recommended Plan which includes floodwalls and a levee provides extremely effective coastal flooding damage reduction and wave action reduction to the assets, including critical infrastructure, within the area.   The Recommended Plan ultimately provides resilience to the entire reach, allowing the communities to return to normal life sooner and with less economic impacts after an event.  More specifically, in this reach, the Recommended Plan would reduce risk from an event with an approximate 0.24% annual exceedance probability and would provide approximately 99% damage reduction under the intermediate sea level rise curve, and approximately 92% damage reduction under the high sea level rise curve.

 

  1. Who will pay for this project?

The project first cost is currently estimated to be $365.2M (including a risk-based contingency), with a Federal cost of $237.4M and a non-federal cost of $127.8M, based on cost sharing percentages from the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Federal: 65%; non-federal 35%).

 

  1. What are the next steps?

 

If the recommended plan presented in the Final Report is supported by USACE decisions makers, it will receive an approved Chief’s Report recommending it for Congressional authorization for construction.The plan will then need to receive Congressional authorization and appropriations for construction and would be cost shared as appropriate between USACE and DNER.  Upon receipt of both, the project would continue to the preconstruction engineering and design (PED) phase where a more detailed analysis would be completed to 100% level of design  before construction of the project.  The project would be expected to be in PED phase for 2 years.  Construction is estimated to take 5 years.

 

 

 

Community Meetings/ Reuniones comunitarias

 

Real Estate Considerations brochure    ENGLISH 

SPANISH

Report Release & Public Meetings

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) Puerto Rico Coastal Study is investigating the coastal storm risks in the areas of Ocean Park and Rincon to identify long-term solutions to impacts from coastal storms and sea level rise. The USACE released a Draft Report in June 2023, and expects to release the Final Report in April 2024. More information on the status and recommended plans can be found in the “study status and updates” tab on this website.

Puerto Rico Coastal Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment - June 2023
PRCS_Draft Main Report and EA-June_2023
PRCS_Draft_FONSI_June_2023
PRCS_Appendix_A_Engineering_June_2023
PRCS_Appendix_B_Geotechnical_June_2023
PRCS_Appendix_C_Cost_June_2023
PRCS_Appendix_D_Economics_June_2023
PRCS_Appendix_E_Real_Estate_June_2023
PRCS_Appendix_F_Plan Form June_2023
PRCS_Appendix_G_June_2023
PRCS_Appendix_H_Pertinent_Correspondence
_June 2023

Contact Information

Please contact the study team at: PuertoRicoCoastalStudy@usace.army.mil

2018 Bipartisan Budget Act

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers received disaster funds provided in Public Law 115-123, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. The act provides nearly $17.4 billion to the Corps for disaster recovery.

Jacksonville District received $3.348 billion for long-term recovery investments in its area of responsibility, which includes Florida, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. This funding will go toward 13 studies, and 22 projects that will reduce risk to communities damaged by storm events. The total Federal funding allocation for Jacksonville District recovery efforts so far exceeds $4 billion.

Additional information can be found here

Community Meetings

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, hosted a Public Open House with the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources in Rincon on September 13, 2022 at Ventana al Mar. The purpose of the Open House was to share the latest study status updates since release of the Draft Report in November 2020.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, hosted a Public Open House with the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources in San Juan on Sept. 14, 2023 at Union Church. The purpose of the Open House was to share the latest study status updates since release of the Draft Report in November 2020.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District hosted an open house meeting for the Puerto Rico Coastal Study on June 18, 2023, at the Ventana Al Mar Convention Center in Rincon, Puerto Rico. The purpose of this meeting was to provide updates referent to the initial scoping process. The public was informed about the criteria used in narrowing of the study areas in order to select focus areas with possible Federal interest. As a result of this preliminary screening, the Puerto Rico Coastal study will focus on parts of the San Juan and Rincon coastlines. The San Juan coastline encompasses approximately 8 miles of shoreline from El Boqueron to Boca de Cangrejos and the Rincon coastline includes approximately 2.5 miles from Punta Ensenada to south of Stella, including Corcega. In addition, the team is considering if there is possible federal interest to protect a segment of the major hurricane/tsunami evacuation routes in Mayaguez (PR-102) and Humacao (Hwy 3). Approximately 100 people attended the open house, with good participation during the public comments hour.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District hosted a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) scoping meeting for the Puerto Rico Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Study Nov. 6, 218 at the El Teatro Manuel Mendez Ballester in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico. The purpose of the scoping meeting was to present and discuss the production of a NEPA document for the feasibility study, and to assess the effects of potential alternatives to reduce coastal storm damages to infrastructure along the coast of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The scoping meeting aides in determining the scope of the NEPA analysis and any potentially significant issues. The Corps of Engineers welcomes views, questions, comments, concerns and suggestions. The Corps believes this study will benefit significantly from public involvement and encourages participation in the NEPA scoping process.