TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. §403) as described below:
APPLICANT: Gulfstream International, Inc.
Attn.: Mario Moeinifar
310 Coconut Isle Drive
Delray Beach, FL 33483
WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect waters of the United States associated with the Ponte Canal and San Marco Canal. The project site is located at 310 Coconut Isle Drive, Section 11, Township 50 South, and Range 42 East, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
APPROXIMATE CENTRAL COORDINATES:
Basic: To provide shoreline stabilization, water access, and upland expansion.
Overall: To provide shoreline stabilization, water access, and upland expansion at an existing single family residence in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project site is located adjacent to a private residence on a corner adjacent to both the Ponte Canal and San Marco Canal, which are assessable to fish and aquatic wildlife species as well as ESA listed species such as manatees, sea turtles, smalltooth sawfish, and other motile species. A benthic survey conducted 24 September 24, 2021 and indicated that the project area consisted of silty muck that was bare of any resources, such as seagrasses.
PROPOSED WORK: The applicant seeks authorization to (1) remove the existing concrete dock and piles; (2) install new 227 linear feet of concrete seawall within 4' to 14' of existing wetface with 280.4 cubic yards of clean backfill, 25 new concrete king piles, 25 new concrete batter piles, and new concrete cap, and (3) construct new 1,493 square foot concrete dock on 25 new concrete dock piles.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION INFORMATION – The applicant has provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment:
• Only clean fill materials would be used;
• Turbidity curtains would be used during construction;
• Applicant would adhere to the Standard Manatee Conditions.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION –
The applicant has provided the following explanation why compensatory mitigation should not be required:
The project would not result in adverse impacts to aquatic resources.
The Corps is evaluating the undertaking for effects to historic properties as required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This public notice serves to inform the public of the proposed undertaking and invites comments including those from local, State, and Federal government Agencies with respect to historic resources. Our final determination relative to historic resource impacts may be subject to additional coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer, those federally recognized tribes with concerns in Florida and the Permit Area, and other interested parties.
The Corps has determined the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect the West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus). Use of The Corps of
Engineers, Jacksonville District, and the State of Florida Effect Determination Key for
the Manatee in Florida (the Key) dated April 2013 and the May 2019 Addendum
produced the sequential determination of A-B-C-G-N-O-P, paragraph 4 and 5 “may
affect, not likely to adversely affect”. The MANLAA determination is based on the
applicant adhering to the “Standard Manatee Conditions for In-Water Work (2011)”.
By letters dated 25 April 2013 and 13 May 2019, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) stated that for proposed in-water activities analyzed with the April 2013 version
of the Manatee Key and May 2019 Addendum in which the Corps reaches a MANLAA
determination with respect to the manatee, the FWS concurs with the Corps determination in accordance with 50 CFR 402.14(b) 1; and no further consultation with
the FWS is required.
The Corps has determined the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect Loggerhead (Caretta caretta), Green (Chelonia mydas), and Kemp’s
Ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) sea turtles, Smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata) and the
North Atlantic Right Whale (Eubalaena glacialis). The Corps will evaluate the proposed
work and request concurrence from the National Marine Fisheries Service.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH):
This notice initiates consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service on EFH as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1996. The proposal would impact approximately 0.03 of an acre of barren submerged bottom utilized by various life stages of penaeid shrimp complex, reef fish, stone crab, spiny lobster, migratory/pelagic fish, and snapper/grouper complex. Our initial determination is that the proposed action would not have a substantial adverse impact on EFH or Federally managed fisheries in the South Atlantic Region. Our final determination relative to project impacts and the need for mitigation measures is subject to review by and coordination with the National Marine Fisheries Service.
NAVIGATION: The proposed project would occupy more than 25% width of the waterway.
SECTION 408: The applicant will not require permission under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC 408) because the activity, in whole or in part, would not alter, occupy, or use a Corps Civil Works project.
NOTE: This public notice is being issued based on information furnished by the applicant. This information has not been verified or evaluated to ensure compliance with laws and regulation governing the regulatory program. The jurisdictional line has been verified by Corps personnel.
COMMENTS regarding the potential authorization of the work proposed should be submitted in writing to the attention of the District Engineer through the Palm Beach Gardens Permits Section, 4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 within 21 days from the date of this notice.
The decision whether to issue or deny this permit application will be based on the information received from this public notice and the evaluation of the probable impact to the associated wetlands. This is based on an analysis of the applicant's avoidance and minimization efforts for the project, as well as the compensatory mitigation proposed.
QUESTIONS concerning this application should be directed to the project manager, Christian Karvounis, in writing at the Palm Beach Gardens Permits Section, 4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410; by e-mail at Christian.G.Karvounis@usace.army.mil; or, by telephone at (561)-472-3508.
IMPACT ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Coordination with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Marine Fisheries Services, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, environmental groups, and concerned citizens generally yields pertinent environmental information that is instrumental in determining the impact the proposed action will have on the natural resources of the area.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including cumulative impacts thereof; among these are conservation, economics, esthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food, and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people.
The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other Interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this determination, comments are used to assess impacts to endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY: In Florida, the State approval constitutes compliance with the approved Coastal Zone Management Plan. In Puerto Rico, a Coastal Zone Management Consistency Concurrence is required from the Puerto Rico Planning Board. In the Virgin Islands, the Department of Planning and Natural Resources permit constitutes compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Plan.
REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request a public hearing. The request must be submitted in writing to the District Engineer within the designated comment period of the notice and must state the specific reasons for requesting the public hearing.