TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344). The purpose of this public notice is to solicit comments from the public regarding the work described below:
If you are interested in receiving additional project drawings associated with this public notice, please send an e-mail to the project manager by electronic mail at Amber.N.Goldberg@usace.army.mil.
APPLICANT: Keith Summers
17750 Maple Hill Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect aquatic resources associated with Alligator Harbor. The project site is located at 1680 Alligator Drive; at latitude 29.904707° and longitude -84.422059°; in Section 3, Township 6 south, Range 2 west, Alligator Point, Franklin County, Florida.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The permit area is located on a 0.6740-acre parcel, Franklin County Property Appraiser – Parcel Identification Number 03-07S-02W-1010-0000-065A, located to the north of Alligator Drive. The permit area includes 0.56-acres of estuarine intertidal, emergent wetlands that abut Alligator Harbor. A 0.09-acre upland coastal grassland is located on the northern portion of the permit area, directly adjacent to Alligator Habor.
PROJECT PURPOSE:
Basic: Construct a single-family residence.
Overall: Construct a single-family residence and associated infrastructure in Alligator Point, Franklin County, Florida.
PROPOSED WORK: The applicant requests authorization for the discharge of 697 cubic yards of clean fill into 0.22-acres of estuarine intertidal wetlands to facilitate the construction of a single-family residence and associated infrastructure.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION: The applicant has provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment: “Without the proposed fill, the county will not issue authorization for a proposed dwelling. Additionally, the state will not issue authorization for an on-site sewage treatment device (OSTD). The fill quantity has been reduced to the minimum amount required for an OSTD system to be installed. Due to mandatory OSTD setbacks from the wetlands, no further reduction in fill area is possible. Silt fencing will be installed around the project area to prevent sediment runoff.”
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: The applicant offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable functional loss to the aquatic environment: “to off-set unavoidable impacts the applicant proposes to purchase estuarine intertidal, emergent credits from Horseshoe Mitigation Bank.”
CULTURAL RESOURCES:
The Corps is evaluating the undertaking for effects to historic properties as required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This public notice serves to inform the public of the proposed undertaking and invites comments including those from local, State, and Federal government Agencies with respect to historic resources. Our final determination relative to historic resource impacts may be subject to additional coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer, federally recognized tribes and other interested parties.
The District Engineer’s final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon coordination with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to the proposed undertaking’s potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the Corps-identified permit area.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: The Corps has performed an initial review of the application, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Section 7 Mapper, and the NMFS Critical Habitat Mapper to determine if any threatened, endangered, proposed, or candidate species, as well as the proposed and final designated critical habitat may occur in the vicinity of the proposed project. Based on this initial review, the Corps has made a preliminary determination that the proposed project will not affect any listed species or critical habitat.
Table 1: ESA-listed species and/or critical habitat potentially present in the action area.
|
Species Common Name and/or Critical Habitat Name
|
Scientific Name
|
Federal Status
|
|
Tricolored Bat
|
Perimyotis subflavus
|
Proposed Endangered
|
|
West Indian Manatee
|
Trichechus manatus
|
Threatened
|
|
Eastern Black Rail
|
Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis
|
Threatened
|
|
Piping Plover
|
Charadrius melodus
|
Threatened
|
|
Rufa Red Knot
|
Calidris canutus rufa
|
Threatened
|
|
Whooping Crane
|
Grus americana
|
Experimental Population, Non-Essential
|
|
Alligator Snapping Turtle
|
Macrochelys temminckii
|
Proposed Threatened
|
|
Eastern Indigo Snake
|
Drymarchon couperi
|
Threatened
|
|
Green Sea Turtle
|
Chelonia mydas
|
Threatened
|
|
Gulf Sturgeon
|
Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi
|
Threatened
|
|
Monarch Butterfly
|
Danaus plexippus
|
Proposed Threatened
|
|
Godfrey’s Butterwort
|
Pinguicula ionantha
|
Threatened
|
|
Telephus Spurge
|
Euphorbia telephioides
|
Threatened
|
|
White Birds-in-a-nest
|
Macbridea alba
|
Threatened
|
Pursuant to Section 7 ESA, any required consultation with the Service(s) will be conducted in accordance with 50 CFR part 402. The Corps is the lead Federal agency for ESA consultation for the proposed action. Any required consultation will be completed by Corps.
This notice serves as request to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service for any additional information on whether any listed or proposed to be listed endangered or threatened species or critical habitat may be present in the area which would be affected by the proposed activity.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1996, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined information provided by the applicant, and consulted available species information.
This notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Our initial determination is that the proposed action may adversely affect EFH and/or fisheries managed by Fishery Management Councils and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Implementation of the proposed project would directly impact approximately 0.22-acres of estuarine intertidal, emergent wetlands. The effects of the project are determined to be minimal and permanent. These habitat(s) are utilized by the following species and their various life stages:
Table 2: Essential Fish Habitat species potentially present in the action area.
|
Species
|
Life Stage
|
|
Bonnethead Shark (Gulf of Mexico Stock)
|
Neonate, Juvenile, Adult
|
|
Blacknose Shark (Gulf of Mexico Stock)
|
Neonate, Juvenile, Adult
|
|
Blacktip Shark (Gulf of Mexico Stock)
|
Neonate
|
|
Scalloped Hammerhead Shark
|
Neonate
|
|
Nurse Shark
|
Juvenile/Adult
|
|
Spinner Shark
|
Neonate
|
|
Bull Shark
|
Juvenile/Adult
|
|
Red Drum
|
All
|
|
Reef Fish
|
All
|
|
Coastal Migratory Pelagics
|
All
|
Our final determination relative to project impacts and the need for mitigation measures is subject to review by and coordination with the National Marine Fisheries Service.
NAVIGATION: The proposed structure or activity is not located in the vicinity of a federal navigation channel.
SECTION 408: The applicant will not require permission under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 USC 408) because the activity, in whole or in part, would not alter, occupy, or use a Corps Civil Works project.
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: Water Quality Certification may be required from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). WQC was granted with conditions by FDEP under FDEP File No. 0443107-001-EI/19 on November 18, 2024.
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY: Coastal Zone Consistency Concurrence is required from the FDEP. In Florida, the State approval constitutes compliance with the approved Coastal Zone Management Plan.
NOTE: This public notice is being issued based on information furnished by the applicant. This information has not been verified or evaluated to ensure compliance with laws and regulation governing the regulatory program. The geographic extent of aquatic resources within the proposed project area that either are, or are presumed to be, within the Corps jurisdiction has not been verified by Corps personnel.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including cumulative impacts thereof; among these are conservation, economics, esthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food, and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people. Evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will also include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, EPA, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act or the criteria established under authority of Section 102(a) of the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972. A permit will be granted unless its issuance is found to be contrary to the public interest.
COMMENTS: The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other Interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this determination, comments are used to assess impacts to endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
The Jacksonville District will receive written comments on the proposed work, as outlined above, until September 12, 2025. Comments should be submitted electronically via the Regulatory Request System (RRS) at https://rrs.usace.army.mil/rrs or to Amber Stroble at Amber.N.Goldberg@usace.army.mil. Alternatively, you may submit comments in writing to the Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, Attention: Amber Stroble, P.O. Box 4970, Jacksonville, Florida 32232. Please refer to the permit application number in your comments.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing will be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
Click here for public notice and graphics