TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. §403) as described below:
APPLICANT: Osceola County Board of County Commissioners
1 Courthouse Square
Kissimmee, FL 34741
WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The project would affect waters of the United States (WOTUS) associated with East Lake Tohopekaliga (12-digit HUC 030901010104) and Lake Myrtle (12-digit HUC 030901010201). The project site is located along Cyrils Drive, between N. Narcoossee Road and Absher Road, in Sections 03, 04, 09, and 10 Township 25 South, Range 31 East, Osceola County, Florida.
Directions to the site are as follows: The project site is located along Cyrils Drive, between N. Narcoossee Road and Absher Road.
Western Terminus: Latitude 28.334651°
Eastern Terminus: Latitude 28.333722°
Overall: Increase east-west traffic capacity and provide multi-modal corridor by improving an existing roadway, to serve the growing residential communities and population within the area of northern Osceola County, Florida.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The project area is approximately ±28 acres, of which approximately 7 acres are wetlands (W), 0.29 acre are other surface waters (OSW), 1 acre is forested uplands, and the remaining 20 acres are comprised of existing paved roadway and associated altered upland right-of-way.
On-site wetlands include 0.23 acre of remnant low-quality palustrine wetlands (W3 and W4) exhibiting considerable adverse effects from previous and existing land use practices (existing roadway and residential development), and approximately 6.75 acres of moderate-high quality palustrine wetlands (W1, W2, W7, and W8) which have been less-impaired by previous and existing land use practices. On-site OSW1 and OSW2, 0.29 acre total, are characterized as roadside drainage swales.
On-site uplands are primarily developed or substantially altered, and do not provide significant habitat or ecological function.
The existing areas surrounding the ±28-acre project area consists of approximately 50% cover by medium and low density residential development, and 50% cover by high-quality natural wetland and upland habitats.
PROPOSED WORK: The applicant seeks authorization to fill 6.98 acres of Section 404 wetlands (2.13 acres of which are also Section 10 waters) and 0.29 acre of Section 404 OSWs. Improvements include widening an existing 2-lane roadway to a 4-lane divided roadway with curb and gutter, addition of a pedestrian sidewalk along the north side of the roadway and multi-use trail along the south side of the roadway, and construction of associated stormwater management facilities/pond.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION INFORMATION: The applicant has provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment:
Presently, Cyrils Drive is an existing two-lane roadway that passes through two large freshwater marsh communities and fragmented forested wetland communities. Accordingly, the widening of Cyrils Drive will result in additional fill impacts to wetlands fringing the existing roadway. The proposed widening improvements follow the same Cyrils Drive alignment and impacts to the same wetland systems.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: The applicant has offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable functional loss to the aquatic environment:
Direct and secondary impacts to wetlands were evaluated utilizing the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM). As detailed in the submitted UMAM functional assessment, the direct and secondary impacts account for a total of 5.52 UMAM units of functional loss. In order to offset these losses, 5.52 UMAM functional units/credits of functional gain will be realized with the proposed purchase of 5.52 Federal Palustrine UMAM credits from a federally approved/permitted mitigation bank authorized to service the subject project area.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The Corps is evaluating the undertaking for effects to historic properties as required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This public notice serves to inform the public of the proposed undertaking and invites comments including those from local, State, and Federal government Agencies with respect to historic resources. Our final determination relative to historic resource impacts may be subject to additional coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer, those federally recognized tribes with concerns in Florida and the Permit Area, and other interested parties.
Wood Stork: The Corps has determined the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect (MANLAA) the Wood Stork and its designated critical habitat. The Corps completed an evaluation of the project based upon the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) South Florida Ecological Services Field Offices Programmatic Concurrence for use with the Wood Stork (January 2010). Use of the Key for Wood Stork resulted in the following sequential determination: A (Project impacts Suitable Foraging Habitat (SFH) at a location greater than 0.47 mile from a colony site) > B (Project impact to SFH is greater in scope than 0.50 acre) > C (Project impacts to SFH within the Core Foraging Area (CFA) of a colony site) > E (Project provides SFH compensation in accordance with the CWA section 404(b)(1) guidelines and is not contrary to the Habitat Management Guidelines (HMG); habitat compensation is within the appropriate CFA or within the service area of a Service-approved mitigation bank; and…) = MANLAA. The Corps has FWS concurrence for the proposed activities through the use of the aforementioned determination key.
Eastern Indigo Snake: The Corps has determined the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect (MANLAA) the Eastern Indigo Snake and its designated critical habitat. The Corps completed an evaluation of the project based upon review of the FWS South Florida Ecological Services Field Offices Programmatic Concurrence for use with the Eastern Indigo Snake (August 2017). Use of the Key for the Eastern Indigo Snake (EIS) resulted in the following sequential determination: A (Project is not located in open water or salt marsh) > B (Permit will be conditioned for use of the Service's most current guidance for Standard Protection Measures For The Eastern Indigo Snake (currently 2013) during site preparation and project construction) > C (The project will impact less than 25 acres of EIS habitat) > D (The project has known holes, cavities, active or inactive gopher tortoise burrows, or other underground refugia where a snake could be buried, trapped and /or injured) > E (Any permit will be conditioned such that all gopher tortoise burrows, active or inactive, will be excavated prior to site manipulation in the vicinity of the burrow. If an EIS is encountered, the snake must be allowed to vacate the area prior to additional site manipulation in the vicinity. Any permit will also be conditioned such that holes, cavities , and snake refugia other than gopher tortoise burrows will be inspected each morning before planned site manipulation of a particular area, and, if occupied by an eastern indigo snake, no work will commence until the snake has vacated the vicinity of proposed work.) = MANLAA. The Corps has FWS concurrence for the proposed activities through the use of the aforementioned determination key.
The Corps has determined the proposal would have no effect on any other federally listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH): This notice initiates consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service on EFH as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1996. Our initial determination is that the proposed action would not have a substantial adverse impact on EFH or Federally managed fisheries. Our final determination relative to project impacts and the need for mitigation measures is subject to review by and coordination with the National Marine Fisheries Service.
SECTION 408: The applicant will not require permission under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC 408) because the activity, in whole or in part, would not alter, occupy, or use a Corps Civil Works project.
NOTE: This public notice is being issued based on information furnished by the applicant. This information has not been verified or evaluated to ensure compliance with laws and regulation governing the regulatory program. The jurisdictional line has been verified by Corps personnel.
COMMENTS regarding the potential authorization of the work proposed should be submitted in writing to the attention of the District Engineer through the Cocoa Permits Section, 400 High Point Drive, Suite 600, Cocoa, FL 32926 within 21 days from the date of this notice.
The decision whether to issue or deny this permit application will be based on the information received from this public notice and the evaluation of the probable impact to the associated wetlands. This is based on an analysis of the applicant's avoidance and minimization efforts for the project, as well as the compensatory mitigation proposed.
QUESTIONS concerning this application should be directed to the project manager, Jason D. Perryman, in writing at the Cocoa Permits Section, 400 High Point Drive, Suite 600, Cocoa, FL 32926; by electronic mail at email@example.com; or, by telephone at (321) 504-3771, ext. 0010.
IMPACT ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Coordination with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Marine Fisheries Services, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, environmental groups, and concerned citizens generally yields pertinent environmental information that is instrumental in determining the impact the proposed action will have on the natural resources of the area.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including cumulative impacts thereof; among these are conservation, economics, esthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food, and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people.
Evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will also include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, EPA, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act.
The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other Interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this determination, comments are used to assess impacts to endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: Water Quality Certification may be required from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY: In Florida, the State approval constitutes compliance with the approved Coastal Zone Management Plan.
REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request a public hearing. The request must be submitted in writing to the District Engineer within the designated comment period of the notice and must state the specific reasons for requesting the public heari